Thursday, 9 April 2015

Femism memes

Femism memes

WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.
Feminists not real 650
The general election is a bit tedious just now. So here is some fun to brighten your day
Equality of opportunity should be a cornerstone of our society. That anyone and everyone must be capable of rising in society to the limits of their abilities. There is a global movement that supports and encourages such equality and it is called humanism. Anyone who is an activist for equality should be a humanist, it is intellectually coherent and prefers critical thinking and evidence (rationalism, empiricism) over established doctrine or faith (fideism).
Conservative Sajid-Javid- 650
Equality of outcome, as in Labour party all female shortlists, is pure evil. It involves positive discrimination against individual people or groups of people. Every moral person should be fighting against this at every opportunity.
Feminism is a joke. It is Marxist misandry, intellectually impoverished and self centred. They are more concerned with defeating the patriarchy by growing and dying their armpit hair than they are with addressing the problem of their millions of sisters who suffer genital mutilation. They are pathetic, which makes them a great butt for all sorts of humour.
Freedom of speech 650
Before we get to the fun it is worth reading my earlier articlesFeminism is an utter joke and Political correctness is for idiots (click highlighted text to see article).
OK. Let’s go:
Feminism 1 650
Feminism 2 650
Feminism 3 650
Feminism 3 waves 500
Feminism armpit hair 500
feminism cartoon 650
Feminism equality and revenge 650
Feminism clothes 650
Feminism hooters 650
Feminism makeup 650
Feminism men's work 500
Feminism not raped 650
Feminism quotes 650
Feminism radical 650
Feminism sexuality 650
Feminism wimledon 650
Feminism womyn's studies 650
Feminism. My vagina has a voice. 650
Feminism. Time of month 650
Feminist 4 500
Feminist anal 650
Feminist control 650
Feminist fear of public loo 650
Feminist Thatcher 650
Feminist transition 650
Feminist vegan 500
Feminists balame men 650
Femism before after 500

Enough for one post! There are plenty more, so it is a subject well worth revisiting.

Brown and Balls (not the banks) trashed the economy

Brown and Balls (not the banks) trashed the economy

WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.

UK GDP growth 650
As we all know the UK economy suffered a huge 7.2% recession Q2-2008 until Q3-2009. This was caused by Gordon Brown’s mismanagement of the economy. Aided and abetted by Ed Balls. His worst mistakes were profligate and inefficient government spending, even when the economy was booming, making a complete mess of financial services regulations, allowing a huge property price bubble and unbalancing the economy away from manufacturing. Labour tried to blame the banks, when it was not the banks’ fault. The BBC have taken up this lie as a mantra to be repeated whenever possible. The banks are the good guys, they contribute enormously to the British economy and helped dig it out of Gordon Brown’s immense black hole.
Labour Brown promise 650
The incredible success of the banks improves the quality of life of everyone in Britain. In 2013 UK financial services had a trade surplus of £61bn, enough money to build 100 large hospitals. They paid a total of £65bn in tax, including corporation tax of £6.5bn and  employment taxes of £28.4bn. When you consider that the TOTAL income tax paid by EVERYONE in the UK is £160bn you can do some interesting maths. Basically without the tax paid by the financial services industry the rest of us would have to pay around 50% more income tax.
The bank “rescue” orchestrated by Brown was abysmal. Under capitalism the shareholders and bondholders pay for a management failure. Under Brown’s cronyism the state paid. A Scottish prime minister throwing (mainly) English taxpayer’s money at Scottish banks to save Scottish jobs. Look at Washington Mutual to see how it should have been done, with assets valued at $327.9 billion, that went bust in 2008 with capitalism sorting out the mess.
Also worth noting is that the headline figure bandied around for the bail out is £500 billion. Another lie. The RBS Group raised £5 billion in preference shares and £15 billion in ordinary shares. HBOS and Lloyds TSB together raised £17 billion, £8.5 billion in preference shares and £8.5 billion of ordinary shares. So £37 billion in total. An amount that was then a little over two weeks of the average spending for the UK government.
And Brown, far from solving the banking problem was actually instrumental in making it far worse. He vetoed Barclay’s proposed rescue of Lehman’s. “We don’t want US problems infecting the UK system” the US government was told. Lehman’s went bust and contagion on both sides of the Atlantic was the result. Labour do not, never have and never will understand business or economics, if they did they wouldn’t be socialists.
Brown Balls 650
Ed Balls was Economic Secretary to the Treasury, from May 2006 till 27 Jun 2007 and had a major role in formulating Labour’s ridiculous economic policies that failed so badly.
“The 2008 crisis was that of credit. Credit had increased considerably in the preceding years: borrowers and lenders had relied on the growing housing prices to refinance their loans.”
“Accusations then multiplied against central banks for having maintained interest rates at too low a level and for too long a time after 11th September 2001.”
“So if Gordon Brown’s monetary framework is not at fault, the causes of the credit crisis and the deep recession that followed must be found elsewhere. Massive research has already evidenced financial deregulation; expansionary budget policies and the accumulation of debt; restricted social policies not providing enough automatic stabilizers; and insufficient industrial policies.”
“The responsibility for the financial crisis and its economic outcomes rather lies in the other-than-monetary policies Gordon Brown implemented in the fields of financial regulation and budget management on the one hand, and in the development of the liquidity trap phenomenon on the other hand.”
Secondly there is this brief article, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Ed Balls’ Economic Legacy, written by an author of economic books. And there are more interesting quotes:
“The new Labour project was fundamentally flawed economically.
It failed to recognise the supply performance issues that challenge the UK economy and the way that many of the central problems arose out of a ratio of public spending that is too high in relation to national income. New Labour’s rhetoric and fiscal rules honed by Gordon Brown with the help of Ed Balls were a mask for a new Keynesian agenda.
Higher public expenditure and higher government borrowing dressed up in words such as prudence that pretended they were something else. The fiscal rules far from being an effective restraint on public spending and government borrowing accommodated any level of government spending and the creation of a significant budget deficit when the economy was operating at the peak of the economic cycle and over heating. New Labour’s huge increase in government spending aggravated the British economy’s long-term structural supply-side challenge at a time when it was about to become more difficult to manage as China, Indian and other emerging economies become more competitive. The spending, taxation and regulation of New Labour made the traded goods and services sectors and the manufacturing sector in particular less internationally competitive. As well as seriously aggravating these long-term structural supply performance problems Gordon Brown created the conditions for the acute fiscal crisis that  is now overlaying these structural supply performance matters.”
“Today the New Labour economic legacy is a fiscal crisis, a public sector that is too large and an economy that has been consuming beyond its productive capacity. Public spending was planned and increased in the context of an unrealistic judgment about the UK economy long-term trend rate of growth.”
“The economy’s capacity to supply was damaged by New Labour’s spending and taxation before the credit crunch. Labour attempts to improve labour supply through education and training in many respects represented a miss-specification of the problem and hindered  rather than helped. The slump in output has exposed Britain’s supply-side and fiscal problems and it has also further reduced the economy’s productive capacity. ”
You must be beginning to notice a trend here! So let’s look at a third article, this time from the Tax Payer’s Alliance, Some quotes:
“This poor growth performance is driven by an increasing burden of government spending, Britain falling behind in cutting corporate tax and increasing regulation and tax complexity. Britain slipped from having the 5 th lowest corporate tax rate in the OECD to the 10th highest, out of 30.”
“Spending on a range of public services has increased substantially but the results have been poor. The trend in falling mortality amenable to healthcare has not improved, Britain has fallen down international education rankings, recorded crime has increased and Britain has the lowest ratio of motorway network to the number of cars of any major European economy.”
“The tax burden has increased by 51 per cent in real terms since 1997-98 as tax rates have increased and the thresholds for many taxes have not been increased in line with inflation. Real disposable incomes increased by an average of 3.2 per cent each year before Gordon Brown became Chancellor but have gone up by just 2.6 per cent in each year since.”
As you can see, three consistent resources telling the same story. And one utterly different to the lies trotted out endlessly by the BBC/Labour Party/Trade Unions/Guardian.
It was Gordon Brown who trashed the British economy, aided and abetted by Ed Balls. The great recession was not the fault of the banks. If you believed that before you had been lied to. If you still believe it then you have a problem with the proven facts.
Balls always wrong 650
Be sociable, share!

Labour really are the nasty party

Labour really are the nasty party

WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.
People Hold Parties Following The Announcement Of Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's Death
The problem Labour have is that every time they have been in government they have trashed the economy and greatly harmed Great Britain. This is an irrefutable fact. If they gain power again then they will trash the economy again. They are already promising to do this. Their problem is that their dogma doesn’t work. Punishing success, rewarding failure and giving more power to the state are all policies that have been proven to fail every time they have been tried. Capitalism, free markets, hard work, enterprise and trade are what generate wealth for our society and everyone in it. History has proven that there is no other way.
Labour PIE supporters 650
Labour child sex press release 650
One issue that is very much in the news these days is paedophilia. There is no doubt that there was a small epidemic of this at Westminster, seemingly associated with freemasonry, in recent decades. Individuals from all political parties were involved. However politicians from only one party were actively involved in promoting paedophilia, trying to make it legal. Hewitt, Dromey and Harman were associated with the Paedophile Information Exchange. Any decent political party would have kicked them out. But the nasty Labour party promoted them.
Labour Moran false claims 650
We all know about the MP expenses scandal. But what most people don’t realise is that there were very thorough investigations of every MP and only six were prosecuted for criminal fraud. And all of these six were Labour; Elliot Morley, David Chaytor, Jim Devine, Eric Illsley, Margaret Moran, and Denis MacShane. Only MPs from the nasty party thought it was OK to steal from the British people.
Mid-Staffordshire-in-numbers-Infographic 650
Under the last Labour government the NHS became a disgrace. Concerned only with targets and appeasing the trade unions. The patients really didn’t matter. The result was thousands of “excess deaths” at several hospital trusts across Britain. Dehydrated patients forced to drink the water out of flower vases in order to survive. Only nasty Labour would be so inhuman. And Labour Health Secretaries Andy Burnham and Alan Johnson ignored 81 requests for a public inquiry into Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust in the two years after it was first warned of poor NHS care. Only the nasty Labour party would seek to hide the truth about mass deaths of NHS patients like this.
Labour tax avoiders 650
Throughout the current government George Osborne has been targeting tax avoidance. He brought in more prevention measures in one year than Labour did in 13 years. Now Labour have cottoned on to this as part of their class warfare dogma. But Miliband lives in a two kitchen mansion that was partly paid for by tax avoidance on his father’s will. Icon of the left, Tony Benn, likewise avoided tax on his multi-million pound will (some socialist!). And now we know that lots of senior Labour politicians have benefited in the same way. It seems that tax avoidance is bad, except for when the nasty Labour party do it.
Zero-hour 650
Labour zero hours 650
You may have seen a lot in the news of Labour complaining about zero hours contracts. Yet Labour MPs and Labour councils are huge users of these contracts. Only the nasty Labour party is so bare faced hypocritical in doing what it tells other people not to do.
Labour child molestation 650
Rotherham Pakistani Abusers 650
You must be familiar with the brutal, organised, systematic sexual abuse of thousands of children by Pakistanis in Rotherham. The nasty Labour politicians there knew this was going on. Not only did they do nothing to prevent it, they tried to cover up that it was happening. The abuse was a direct consequence of the nasty Labour policies of diversity and multiculturalism.
Blair war 650
Dodgy Dossier 650
During the 13 years of Blair and then Brown we went to war repeatedly. Illegally against Iraq and with no justifiable reason against Afghanistan. As a result at least a million people died and the Middle East was thrown into chaos. There was no militant Salafism before we invaded, now it is rampant. People will die today as a result of Labour actions there. These wars had zero positive outcomes, they achieved precisely nothing. In Iraq 179 British service personnel died and £8.4 billion of our money was thrown away. In Afghanistan there were 453 British dead and the cost was an eye watering £37 billion. Only nasty Labour would throw away so many lives and so much money with no good reason.
Brown with Damian McBride 650
Damian McBride was a Whitehall civil servant and former special adviser to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. In his memoir he boasts of seeking to “destroy” a senior Conservative Shadow Minister, of leaking details of another’s alleged “drinking, fighting and carousing” and tipping off newspapers about their rivals “drug use, spousal abuse, alcoholism and extra-marital affairs”. He exchanged emails discussing the possibility of disseminating rumours that he had totally fabricated about the private lives of some Conservative Party politicians and their spouses. Dirty tricks. Nasty Labour always personally attack their opponents because they have no valid explanation for their own policies and mantra. Conservative policies are always better than Labour policies, as history has proven. This is why nasty Labour are the party of ad hominem. Even the Guardian complains about how nasty Labour are.
Balls miliband  Rachel Reeves 650
Rachel Reeves is the current Labour Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. You would expect her to be compassionate and caring, especially to those in unfortunate circumstances. Here is a direct quote from her which shows the depth of her consideration for those who are less fortunate: “We are not the party of people on benefits. We don’t want to be seen, and we’re not, the party to represent those who are out of work.” “Labour are a party of working people, formed for and by working people”. So there you have it, if you lose your job the nasty Labour party will not represent you. Nasty Labour are not the caring party. They are the party who will say anything to get votes and return to power. Also  Rachel Reeves strongly criticises unpaid internships used by unscrupulous employees. Yet she has has advertised for unpaid internships at least 6 times. Typical, unbelievable nasty Labour party hypocrisy.
Miliband social justice 650
Time after time Labour prove that they are the nasty party. They really have no moral compass. Anyone who votes for the party responsible for all of the above is nasty too and really should be ashamed of themselves.