Saturday, 25 April 2015

How Labour trashed the NHS

How Labour trashed the NHS

WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.
???
I have written before on here about how the NHS is ONLY safe with the Conservatives, an article that drills down to the facts and exposes the Labour lies (click highlighted text to open article). Now lets look at how Labour trashed the NHS. Repeatedly.
Sandy Lane 650
My sister was a GP. She built up and ran one of the biggest GP practices in Britain, Sandy Lane Surgery in Preston, Lancashire. The 1980 Black Report and 1987 Whitehead Report revealed huge failings in the NHS. The Conservatives worked to rectify this with the 1990 NHS and Community Care Act whereby an internal market was introduced, which means health authorities manage their own budgets. Then in 1991 the first NHS Trusts were established to make the service more responsive to the user at a local level. My sister loved this, she said she could get far more treatment for her patients for a given amount of money and that it was starting to make the NHS a lot more efficient.
Then Labour won the 1997 General Election and an unreformed leftist dinosaur, Frank Dobson, was put in charge. He immediately got rid of the internal market, because it was against his dogma. And replaced it with nothing. Unsurprisingly the NHS became a disaster, all the metrics used to measure its performance went in the wrong direction and the newspapers were full of the inevitable horror stories. Eventually Tony Blair couldn’t stand the bad publicity, it would have cost him an election. So at the end of 1999 Dobson was moved to the political backwater of the London Mayor election, which he lost with just 13% of the vote. After which he was cast into political oblivion. His trashing of the NHS had cost Labour dear.
NHS spending 650
NHS managers 650
Frank Dobson was replaced by Alan Milburn, who had a huge task on his hands getting the NHS working again before the election. He did this by restoring some elements of the internal market, recruiting very large numbers of managers, implementing a whole system of “targets” and throwing lots of money at trying to fix the most egregious problems. If anything he made things even worse. The whole of the NHS became an organisation whose purpose was to achieve targets (and to look after the trade unions), patient care was no longer the priority. This led, ultimately, to lots of patients being killed in trusts such as Mid Staffs and Morecambe Bay. The huge spending was one of the factors that led Gordon Brown to give up on his “golden rule”, to borrow whilst the economy was booming, and to ultimately trash the UK economy.
Mid-Staffordshire-in-numbers-Infographic 650

You would think that these disasters would shame any government, but no. Labour continued to trash the NHS in new ways.
NHS A&E 650

nhs-gp-pay-comparison 650
Labour negotiated a new contract with GPs in 2004, when John Reid was health secretary. This was such a giveaway to GPs that they were stunned by its generosity. It took their average salary to more than £100,000 and removed their obligation to provide out of hours care. Labour just hadn’t thought it through. The population of Britain could no longer use their GPs outside of office hours, so they had to go to A&E instead. The hospitals were flooded and couldn’t cope. And the excessive money given to GPs came out of the NHS budget, which made less money available for other care and pushed up Gordon Brown’s excessive spending again.

PFI graph 650
Then Gordon Brown discovered a great trick, he could create a big, brand new hospital without paying for it. Using something called the Private Finance Initiative (PFI). Basically this is hire purchase. So he clicked his fingers lots of times and the hospitals appeared, whether they were needed or not. The problem is that Labour are no good at all at business or economics, so they negotiated spectacularly bad deals. Laughably, pathetically bad. Look at the chart above and you can see what we are paying, up until 2048, for Brown’s idiotic profligacy. And now we have the situation where the repayments are bleeding our NHS trusts dry. Several of them have got into severe financial trouble trying to meet the PFI repayments whilst at the same time trying to afford to look after patients.
So there you have it. In 13 years Labour trashed the NHS in a major way at four least times.
  • Getting rid of the internal market and losing control of patient care.
  • Introducing targets and huge numbers of managers.
  • New GP contract removing out of hours care and costing a fortune.
  • Throwing many billions of pounds of NHS money away with the PFI.
NHS it system 650
After this you would think that voters would never trust Labour anywhere near the NHS again. But no. In 2011 the people of Wales shot themselves in their collective feet and voted for Labour to run the Welsh Assembly. And it has been a disaster. Under the Barnett Formula there is far more government money available per person in Wales than there is in England. So the Welsh NHS should be better than the English NHS. But it isn’t. It is an utter disaster, with people dying in the ambulances that are queued up outside their hospitals. Labour really cannot be allowed anywhere near looking after the health of people.
21F-WALES HOSPITAL TABLE

NHS A&E. #2 650
NHS Wales 650
So why are Labour such a disaster every time they get near the NHS? Firstly they have no understanding of business or economics. And the NHS is one of the biggest businesses in the world. Secondly they are driven by political dogma, everything has to be done to suit their ideology, not to look after patients. Miliband even talks about “weaponising” the NHS as he tries to make it dogma lead. The Conservatives, on the other hand, put the patients first, before any dogma. And the results can be seen in record patient satisfaction:
NHS satisfaction 650

Conservative NHS economy 650
Conservative doctors 650

Social Justice

Social Justice

WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.
Social Justice 650
Social justice is defined as “justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society”.
Our society in the 20th century was built on large scale manufacturing, until this was largely wiped out by the actions of militant, left-wing trade unions. These industries required a large semi literate workforce, a smaller, better educated foreman class, a small, well educated technocratic class for design, engineering, finance, marketing etc and a very small management class to give strategic direction and to take commercial risks. Our education system was engineered to provide these.
Social Justice #6 500
In addition Britain has a very large number of small to medium sized businesses providing goods and services everywhere. These tend to be built upon very hard work and were handed down from generation to generation until the socialists introduced punitive death duties.
Social Justice Hayek
After WW2 Attlee created the welfare state, including unemployment benefit, which was intended to provide short term help between jobs. Gradually this became a long term alternative to work for the feckless and we ended up with millions of parasites living their lives from the effort of others.
social+justice 512
Also thankfully, we created entrepreneurs. People who educated themselves, worked hard, took risks and invested so as to provide goods and services to others. They also generated wealth which benefited all of society.
Socialism. Need. Greed. Compassion. 650
The left in Britain use social justice as a term for their policy of extorting money from successful people and then giving it to unsuccessful people. They seek to punish success and reward failure. As a result our government enforces a tax system that is very highly punitive on hard working successful people. And uses this money to finance a benefits system that greatly rewards the workshy. It is amazing that the left have the gall to call this social justice, because it is the exact opposite. They really have no moral compass.
Social justice bullying 650
So what, really, is social justice? It is a bitter envy of people who have been more successful. It is greed with a person wanting more than they have earned. And it is larceny where the unsuccessful seek to steal from the successful. So the lefty term “social justice” is a term to cover a combination of base emotions.
Miliband social justice 650

General Election party overview

General Election party overview

WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.
Vote farage 650
Thursday 7 May draws closer and the BBC are doing their best to fix the election. Best to switch it off. For a far more reliable understanding just read these articles from this blog. They tell you all you need to know. (Click highlighted text to see article).
Conservative Party:
Labour Party:
SNP:
UKIP:
Lib Dems:
Greens:
Read all the above and you will be one of the best informed voters. This will enable you to do the most moral and beneficial thing both for yourself and your country.
Thatcher vote for a better life 650




Be sociable, share!

Thursday, 9 April 2015

Let our boys go and fight for ISIS

Let our boys go and fight for ISIS

WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.
isis-fighters
My father told me that when he was young several of his friends went to fight in the Spanish Civil War (1936 -1939) and that some of them never came back. They weren’t the only ones, there were about 40,000 people in the International Brigades with about 4,000 from the UK. George Orwell and Laurie Lee fought there. The returnees were met at Victoria Station by Stafford Cripps and Clement Attlee. These were the days before the government thought that it owned your body and mind so nobody thought it was anyone else’s business if a person went abroad to fight.
The French Foreign Legion was founded in 1831 and has always had British fighters, though our endemic national obesity and unfitness is reducing numbers in recent times. They have fought a lot in colonial wars, the two world wars and all the modern interventionist wars. And our political classes don’t give a damn.
Since the foundation of Israel Jews from Britain have gone and fought in its immoral army. Enforcing apartheid, ethnically cleansing Palestinians and engaging in terrorism against Israel’s neighbours. Once again the politicians don’t care.
British Mercenaries have always fought, all over the world, for anyone who will pay them. They played a major role in recent years in suppressing Somali piracy and have worked in Iraq and Afghanistan. There are mercenary companies, such as Control Risks (2,000? employees) and Aegis Defence Services, based in London to organise this. And our politicians aren’t bothered.
In the Middle East just now Sunnis are trying to create a new Salafist state (much like Saudi Arabia, our ally) and are carving it out by taking land from the post Ottoman Sykes Picot countries. Just like the USA took their land from the native Americans and Israel took their land from the Palestinians. They are calling it the Islamic State (formerly ISIS or ISIL) and fighters from around the world are joining the cause, much like the Spanish Civil war. Hundreds have gone from Great Britain and for some unbelievable reason the British Government has made this a criminal offence and our security services are giving them maximum harassment.
So it is OK for British people to go and fight for anyone they want anywhere in the world, so long as it is not our Muslims who go. A law that is as highly prejudiced as you can get. It is even OK to go and fight in the Middle East as long as it is against Islamic State, with Brits now fighting for the Kurds. The hypocrisy and double standards are amazing.
Some may say that we are engaging in this stupidity because the Islamic State killed hostages. But they only started doing this after we started bombing them. (James Wright Foley, 19 August 2014, bombing started 8 August 2014).
Our Government is utterly and totally out of order. Our bodies and our minds belong to us, not to them. We should have our fundamental rights and freedoms, but these have been progressively stolen from us. If any British person wants to go and fight abroad that should be their business and their business alone, unless they act against Great Britain or one of our treaty partners (EU, NATO).
I really am amazed that all our civil rights activists are not up in arms against the Government over the Islamic State fighters issue. Perhaps they too are also prejudiced against Muslims. Everyone in Britain should be worried about this, because what the Government can get away with doing to the Muslims today it can get away with doing to the rest of us later. Any removal of anyone’s rights is something that should have us very worried.
First they came for 650

Why is Miliband so keen to harm Great Britain?

Why is Miliband so keen to harm Great Britain?

WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.
Miliband couldn't run a bath 650
Every policy pronouncement that Ed Miliband makes seems to have not been thought through. So they contain the potential for real harm should he be elected. In fact it is utterly incredible how a British politician can be so utterly ignorant of the consequences of their actions.
  • 5% profit cap on private NHS providers. Will these even cover the cost of the capital they have borrowed to set up their business? And profit is the reward for looking after customers. Cap that profit and there is no incentive to look after the customers (patients) better. And remember that MOST private NHS contracts were set up under Labour. The rate has slowed down under the coalition.
  • Limiting zero hours contracts to 12 weeks. So, quite simply, after 12 weeks the employee will lose their job. Creating huge problems over security of income. And because of the hassle involved a lot of employers just won’t bother. So there will be fewer jobs.
  • Envy taxes. On banker’s bonuses, high earners and nice houses. All three of these taxes will actually reduce government income. Their only purpose is to punish success. And we all know what happens when a behaviour is punished. Already hundreds of thousands of Brits have emigrated to escape high taxes, very many more would follow if these punishments were implemented.
  • Mansion tax is quadruple tax on the same money. Income tax when you earn to pay for your home, stamp duty when you buy it, inheritance tax when you die and now mansion tax because of nasty envy. The effect of mansion tax on stamp duty will result in the treasury receiving less income.
  • Increasing the top rate of income tax reduces government income, it did every time it has been tried before. And the Laffer Curve predicts that people will choose less income when rates become punitive.
  • Bankers are very mobile, all they need is a phone, an internet connection and a computer. Already many London bankers have left for places like Dubai (zero income tax), Singapore (top rate for high earners 20%) and Switzerland (top rate 11.5% + canton tax (13% in Zurich)). The London lifestyle is only worth so much government extortion, living in Dubai will double a banker’s income. Labour would drive out great chunks of an industry that brings huge benefits to the country.
  • Reducing student fees to £6,000. A naked bribe for the student vote. And a policy that massively favours rich people. It is unclear whether Labour will really make up the missing £3,000, so our universities could suffer. And the money to pay for this has to come from somewhere. Labour are always very happy to spend your money but they have no idea where it can come from.
  • Increasing corporation tax, initially to 21%. This is the most stupid tax there is, it directly removes from the economy the funds used for investment and job creation. The world knows this; in 1981 the average rate across the OECD was 48 per cent. It has now plummeted to 24 per cent and is on the way further down. Increasing it will directly harm the economy and will also drive business out of the country. Nobody with even a basic understanding of economics could propose such a damaging course of action. And it probably won’t raise money as it will create reduced economic activity.
  • Ending the under occupancy charge (spare room subsidy). Labour don’t explain where the money to fund this will come from (you) or where the extra rooms will be found. With a severe housing shortage Labour want to use your money to pay for people to squat in bigger houses than they need. This proposal of theirs is utterly immoral.
  • Labour still want to freeze energy bills. Last time they were pushing this stupidity was when prices were at an all time high! They don’t explain where the money will come from to finance this policy if the world price of energy does go up. And high prices are partly a result of the last Labour energy minister (Ed Miliband) putting green levies on your energy bill and reducing competition in the sector. They utterly don’t understand how the world really works.
  • Free child care. This is a typical Labour spend spend spend bribe. And you will pay for it. And your children and grandchildren will.
  • Increasing the national minimum wage to £8. Now I am all for giving more money to poor people when they earn it. But this will result in higher unemployment, the laws of supply and demand say so. The economy of the world will just end up employing people elsewhere, where they are less expensive. And there is nothing that Labour can do to prevent this.
  • Labour say that they are going to control immigration. But they can’t, EU law doesn’t allow them to. Contrast that with David Cameron renegotiating the EU agreement so we can control immigration and then asking us all, in a referendum, if we are happy with that. The Labour hypocrisy on immigration is utterly amazing because it is they who deliberately opened the floodgates.
  • GP waiting time maximum 48 hours. Hypocrisy here again. It was the new GP contract Labour introduced in 2004 that removed out of hours care and overloaded A&E. An action of utter stupidity. Now they have made this promise with no explanation where they will find the thousands of extra GPs from or how they would pay for them.
  • Increasing government spending. Which means either increasing your taxes or increasing the debt that we all owe and have to pay interest on. Lucy Powell admitted this to Andrew Neil, they are going to package it as “capital spending” just as Gordon Brown packaged his fiscal incontinence as “investment”. Obviously “capital spending” is just a new carte blanche for spending ministers to run amok. As they have done in every Labour government in history.
There is more but you must be horrified by now. Compare the above with David Cameron’s government that was handed a crippled economy and in just five years has turned it round to halve the deficit, increase employment to its highest ever and increased real household income to its highest ever. Stunning achievements. Why would anyone want to throw that away?
—————————————————————-
Other articles that are relevant (click highlighted text to open article):
Be sociable, share!